|
IBM SPSS Web Report - Output1 Contents
Previous
Next
Help
|
|
Controls disabled by the system
|
GET
FILE='\\campus.gla.ac.uk\SSD_Home_Data_D\dma22s\Desktop\lisbon-treaty-2-data.sav'.
>Warning # 5281. Command name: GET FILE
>SPSS Statistics is running in Unicode encoding mode. This file is encoded in
>a locale-specific (code page) encoding. The defined width of any string
>variables are automatically tripled in order to avoid possible data loss. You
>can use ALTER TYPE to set the width of string variables to the width of the
>longest observed value for each string variable.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
CODEBOOK qb [n] q1a [n] q1b [n] q1c [n] q4 [n] q5 [n] q6 [n] q7 [n] q8 [n] q9a [n] q9b [n] q9c [n]
q9d [n] q10a [n] q10b [n] q10c [n] q10d [n] q10e [n] q10f [n] q10g [n] q10h [n] q10i [n] q10j [n]
q10k [n] q11 [n] q12 [n] q13 [n] q14a [n] q14ai [n] q14b [n] q14bi [n] q14c [n] q14ci [n] q14d [n]
q14di [n] q14e [n] q14ei [n] q14f [n] q14fi [n] q14g [n] q14gi [n] q14h [n] q14hi [n] q14i [n]
q14ii [n] q15 [n] q16 [n] q17 [n] q18aa [n] q18ab [n] q18ac [n] q18ad [n] q18ae [n] q18af [n] q18ag
[n] q18ah [n] q18ai [n] q18aj [n] q18ak [n] q18al [n] q18am [n] q18an [n] q18ao [n] q18ap [n] q18aq
[n] q18ar [n] q18ba [n] q18bb [n] q18bc [n] q18bd [n] q18be [n] q18bf [n] q18bg [n] q18bh [n] q18bi
[n] q18bj [n] q18bk [n] q18bl [n] q18bm [n] q18bn [n] q18bo [n] q18bp [n] q18bq [n] q18br [n] q19
[n] q20 [n] q21a [n] q21b [n] q21c [n] q21d [n] q21e [n] q21f [n] q22a [n] q22b [n] q22c [n] q22d
[n] q22e [n] q22f [n] q22g [n] q22h [n] q22i [n] q22j [n] q23a [n] q23b [n] q23c [n] q23d [n] q23e
[n] q23f [n] q23g [n] q23h [n] q23i [n] q23j [n] q23k [n] q23l [n] q23m [n] q23n [n] q23o [n] q23p
[n] q24 [n] q25a [n] q25b [n] q26a [n] q26b [n] q26c [n] q26d [n] q26e [n] q26f [n] sex [n] marital
[n] age [n] class [n] region [n] area [n] work [n] indust [n] sector [n] tea [n] mass [n] hhold [n]
@q2aye2 [n] @q2aye3 [n] @q2aye4 [n] @q2aye5 [n] @q2aye6 [n] @q2aye7 [n] @q2aye8 [n] @q2aye9 [n]
@q2aye10 [n] @q2aye11 [n] @q2aye12 [n] @q2aye13 [n] @q2aye14 [n] @q2aye15 [n] @q2aye16 [n] @q2aye17
[n] @q2aye18 [n] @q2aye19 [n] @q2aye20 [n] @q2aye21 [n] @q2aye22 [n] @q2aye23 [n] @q2aye24 [n]
@q2aye25 [n] @q2aye26 [n] @q2aye27 [n] @q2aye28 [n] @q2aye29 [n] @q2aye30 [n] @q2aye31 [n] @q2aye32
[n] @q2aye33 [n] @q2aye34 [n] @q2aye35 [n] @q2aye36 [n] @q2aye37 [n] @q2aye38 [n] @q2aye39 [n]
@q2aye40 [n] @q2aye41 [n] @q2aye42 [n] @q2aye43 [n] @q2aye44 [n] @q2aye45 [n] @q2aye46 [n] @q2aye47
[n] @q2aye48 [n] @q2ano2 [n] @q2ano3 [n] @q2ano4 [n] @q2ano5 [n] @q2ano6 [n] @q2ano7 [n] @q2ano8
[n] @q2ano9 [n] @q2ano10 [n] @q2ano11 [n] @q2ano12 [n] @q2ano13 [n] @q2ano14 [n] @q2ano15 [n]
@q2ano16 [n] @q2ano17 [n] @q2ano18 [n] @q2ano19 [n] @q2ano20 [n] @q2ano21 [n] @q2ano22 [n] @q2ano23
[n] @q2ano24 [n] @q2ano25 [n] @q2ano26 [n] @q2ano27 [n] @q2ano28 [n] @q2ano29 [n] @q2ano30 [n]
@q2ano31 [n] @q2ano32 [n] @q2ano33 [n] @q2ano34 [n] @q2ano35 [n] @q2ano36 [n] @q2ano37 [n] @q2ano38
[n] @q2ano39 [n] @q2ano40 [n] @q2ano41 [n] @q2ano42 [n] @q2ano43 [n] @q2ano44 [n] @q2ano45 [n]
@q2ano46 [n] @q2ano47 [n] @q2ano48 [n] @q2bye2 [n] @q2bye3 [n] @q2bye4 [n] @q2bye5 [n] @q2bye6 [n]
@q2bye7 [n] @q2bye8 [n] @q2bye9 [n] @q2bye10 [n] @q2bye11 [n] @q2bye12 [n] @q2bye13 [n] @q2bye14
[n] @q2bye15 [n] @q2bye16 [n] @q2bye17 [n] @q2bye18 [n] @q2bye19 [n] @q2bye20 [n] @q2bye21 [n]
@q2bye22 [n] @q2bye23 [n] @q2bye24 [n] @q2bye25 [n] @q2bye26 [n] @q2bye27 [n] @q2bye28 [n] @q2bye29
[n] @q2bye30 [n] @q2bye31 [n] @q2bye32 [n] @q2bye33 [n] @q2bye34 [n] @q2bye35 [n] @q2bye36 [n]
@q2bno2 [n] @q2bno3 [n] @q2bno4 [n] @q2bno5 [n] @q2bno6 [n] @q2bno7 [n] @q2bno8 [n] @q2bno9 [n]
@q2bno10 [n] @q2bno11 [n] @q2bno12 [n] @q2bno13 [n] @q2bno14 [n] @q2bno15 [n] @q2bno16 [n] @q2bno17
[n] @q2bno18 [n] @q2bno19 [n] @q2bno20 [n] @q2bno21 [n] @q2bno22 [n] @q2bno23 [n] @q2bno24 [n]
@q2bno25 [n] @q2bno26 [n] @q2bno27 [n] @q2bno28 [n] @q2bno29 [n] @q2bno30 [n] @q2bno31 [n] @q2bno32
[n] @q2bno33 [n] @q2bno34 [n] @q2bno35 [n] @q2bno36 [n] @q32 [n] @q33 [n] @q34 [n] @q35 [n] @q36
[n] @q37 [n] @q38 [n] @q39 [n] @q310 [n] @q311 [n] @q312 [n] @q313 [n] @q314 [n] @q315 [n] @q316
[n] @q317 [n] @q318 [n] @q319 [n] @q320 [n] @q321 [n] @q322 [n] @q323 [n] @q324 [n] @q325 [n] @q326
[n] @q327 [n] @q328 [n] @q329 [n] @q330 [n] @q331 [n] @q332 [n] @q333 [n] @q334 [n] @q335 [n] exage
[s]
/VARINFO POSITION LABEL TYPE FORMAT MEASURE ROLE VALUELABELS MISSING ATTRIBUTES
/OPTIONS VARORDER=VARLIST SORT=ASCENDING MAXCATS=200
/STATISTICS COUNT PERCENT MEAN STDDEV QUARTILES.
| Output Created | 09-OCT-2020 16:01:43 | |
| Comments | ||
| Input | Data | \\campus.gla.ac.uk\SSD_Home_Data_D\dma22s\Desktop\lisbon-treaty-2-data.sav |
| Active Dataset | DataSet1 | |
| Filter | <none> | |
| Weight | <none> | |
| Split File | <none> | |
| N of Rows in Working Data File | 1002 | |
| Syntax | CODEBOOK qb [n] q1a [n] q1b [n] q1c [n] q4 [n] q5 [n] q6 [n] q7 [n] q8 [n] q9a [n] q9b [n] q9c [n] q9d [n] q10a [n] q10b [n] q10c [n] q10d [n] q10e [n] q10f [n] q10g [n] q10h [n] q10i [n] q10j [n] q10k [n] q11 [n] q12 [n] q13 [n] q14a [n] q14ai [n] q14b [n] q14bi [n] q14c [n] q14ci [n] q14d [n] q14di [n] q14e [n] q14ei [n] q14f [n] q14fi [n] q14g [n] q14gi [n] q14h [n] q14hi [n] q14i [n] q14ii [n] q15 [n] q16 [n] q17 [n] q18aa [n] q18ab [n] q18ac [n] q18ad [n] q18ae [n] q18af [n] q18ag [n] q18ah [n] q18ai [n] q18aj [n] q18ak [n] q18al [n] q18am [n] q18an [n] q18ao [n] q18ap [n] q18aq [n] q18ar [n] q18ba [n] q18bb [n] q18bc [n] q18bd [n] q18be [n] q18bf [n] q18bg [n] q18bh [n] q18bi [n] q18bj [n] q18bk [n] q18bl [n] q18bm [n] q18bn [n] q18bo [n] q18bp [n] q18bq [n] q18br [n] q19 [n] q20 [n] q21a [n] q21b [n] q21c [n] q21d [n] q21e [n] q21f [n] q22a [n] q22b [n] q22c [n] q22d [n] q22e [n] q22f [n] q22g [n] q22h [n] q22i [n] q22j [n] q23a [n] q23b [n] q23c [n] q23d [n] q23e [n] q23f [n] q23g [n] q23h [n] q23i [n] q23j [n] q23k [n] q23l [n] q23m [n] q23n [n] q23o [n] q23p [n] q24 [n] q25a [n] q25b [n] q26a [n] q26b [n] q26c [n] q26d [n] q26e [n] q26f [n] sex [n] marital [n] age [n] class [n] region [n] area [n] work [n] indust [n] sector [n] tea [n] mass [n] hhold [n] @q2aye2 [n] @q2aye3 [n] @q2aye4 [n] @q2aye5 [n] @q2aye6 [n] @q2aye7 [n] @q2aye8 [n] @q2aye9 [n] @q2aye10 [n] @q2aye11 [n] @q2aye12 [n] @q2aye13 [n] @q2aye14 [n] @q2aye15 [n] @q2aye16 [n] @q2aye17 [n] @q2aye18 [n] @q2aye19 [n] @q2aye20 [n] @q2aye21 [n] @q2aye22 [n] @q2aye23 [n] @q2aye24 [n] @q2aye25 [n] @q2aye26 [n] @q2aye27 [n] @q2aye28 [n] @q2aye29 [n] @q2aye30 [n] @q2aye31 [n] @q2aye32 [n] @q2aye33 [n] @q2aye34 [n] @q2aye35 [n] @q2aye36 [n] @q2aye37 [n] @q2aye38 [n] @q2aye39 [n] @q2aye40 [n] @q2aye41 [n] @q2aye42 [n] @q2aye43 [n] @q2aye44 [n] @q2aye45 [n] @q2aye46 [n] @q2aye47 [n] @q2aye48 [n] @q2ano2 [n] @q2ano3 [n] @q2ano4 [n] @q2ano5 [n] @q2ano6 [n] @q2ano7 [n] @q2ano8 [n] @q2ano9 [n] @q2ano10 [n] @q2ano11 [n] @q2ano12 [n] @q2ano13 [n] @q2ano14 [n] @q2ano15 [n] @q2ano16 [n] @q2ano17 [n] @q2ano18 [n] @q2ano19 [n] @q2ano20 [n] @q2ano21 [n] @q2ano22 [n] @q2ano23 [n] @q2ano24 [n] @q2ano25 [n] @q2ano26 [n] @q2ano27 [n] @q2ano28 [n] @q2ano29 [n] @q2ano30 [n] @q2ano31 [n] @q2ano32 [n] @q2ano33 [n] @q2ano34 [n] @q2ano35 [n] @q2ano36 [n] @q2ano37 [n] @q2ano38 [n] @q2ano39 [n] @q2ano40 [n] @q2ano41 [n] @q2ano42 [n] @q2ano43 [n] @q2ano44 [n] @q2ano45 [n] @q2ano46 [n] @q2ano47 [n] @q2ano48 [n] @q2bye2 [n] @q2bye3 [n] @q2bye4 [n] @q2bye5 [n] @q2bye6 [n] @q2bye7 [n] @q2bye8 [n] @q2bye9 [n] @q2bye10 [n] @q2bye11 [n] @q2bye12 [n] @q2bye13 [n] @q2bye14 [n] @q2bye15 [n] @q2bye16 [n] @q2bye17 [n] @q2bye18 [n] @q2bye19 [n] @q2bye20 [n] @q2bye21 [n] @q2bye22 [n] @q2bye23 [n] @q2bye24 [n] @q2bye25 [n] @q2bye26 [n] @q2bye27 [n] @q2bye28 [n] @q2bye29 [n] @q2bye30 [n] @q2bye31 [n] @q2bye32 [n] @q2bye33 [n] @q2bye34 [n] @q2bye35 [n] @q2bye36 [n] @q2bno2 [n] @q2bno3 [n] @q2bno4 [n] @q2bno5 [n] @q2bno6 [n] @q2bno7 [n] @q2bno8 [n] @q2bno9 [n] @q2bno10 [n] @q2bno11 [n] @q2bno12 [n] @q2bno13 [n] @q2bno14 [n] @q2bno15 [n] @q2bno16 [n] @q2bno17 [n] @q2bno18 [n] @q2bno19 [n] @q2bno20 [n] @q2bno21 [n] @q2bno22 [n] @q2bno23 [n] @q2bno24 [n] @q2bno25 [n] @q2bno26 [n] @q2bno27 [n] @q2bno28 [n] @q2bno29 [n] @q2bno30 [n] @q2bno31 [n] @q2bno32 [n] @q2bno33 [n] @q2bno34 [n] @q2bno35 [n] @q2bno36 [n] @q32 [n] @q33 [n] @q34 [n] @q35 [n] @q36 [n] @q37 [n] @q38 [n] @q39 [n] @q310 [n] @q311 [n] @q312 [n] @q313 [n] @q314 [n] @q315 [n] @q316 [n] @q317 [n] @q318 [n] @q319 [n] @q320 [n] @q321 [n] @q322 [n] @q323 [n] @q324 [n] @q325 [n] @q326 [n] @q327 [n] @q328 [n] @q329 [n] @q330 [n] @q331 [n] @q332 [n] @q333 [n] @q334 [n] @q335 [n] exage [s] /VARINFO POSITION LABEL TYPE FORMAT MEASURE ROLE VALUELABELS MISSING ATTRIBUTES /OPTIONS VARORDER=VARLIST SORT=ASCENDING MAXCATS=200 /STATISTICS COUNT PERCENT MEAN STDDEV QUARTILES. |
|
| Resources | Processor Time | 00:00:00.41 |
| Elapsed Time | 00:00:00.38 | |
[DataSet1] \\campus.gla.ac.uk\SSD_Home_Data_D\dma22s\Desktop\lisbon-treaty-2-data.sav
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 1 | ||
| Label | B. IS YOUR NAME ON THE ELECTORAL REGISTER THAT IS THE LIST OF THOSE ENTITLED TO VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes | 964 | 96.2% |
| 3.00 | No | 19 | 1.9% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 2 | ||
| Label | Q.1A DID YOU VOTE IN THE REFERENDUM ON THE TREATY OF LISBON THAT WAS HELD IN OCTOBER? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - voted | 756 | 75.4% |
| 3.00 | Did not vote | 241 | 24.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 3 | ||
| Label | Q.1B HOW DID YOU VOTE IN THAT REFERENDUM - IN FAVOUR OR AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes | 485 | 48.4% |
| 3.00 | No | 271 | 27.0% | |
| Missing Values | -99.99 | 246 | 24.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 4 | ||
| Label | Q.1C WHEN DID YOU MAKE UP YOUR MIND HOW YOU WOULD VOTE IN THAT REFERENDUM? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 246 | 24.6% | |
| 2.00 | At the time the referendum was announced | 248 | 24.8% | |
| 3.00 | Fairly early on during the referendum campaign | 297 | 29.6% | |
| 4.00 | In the final week of the campaign | 148 | 14.8% | |
| 5.00 | On the day of the referendum itself | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 6.00 | Don't Know/Not stated | 26 | 2.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 5 | ||
| Label | Q.4 DID YOU VOTE IN THE REFERENDUM ON THE TREATY OF LISBON THAT WAS HELD IN JUNE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - voted | 724 | 72.3% |
| 3.00 | Did not vote | 261 | 26.0% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 6 | ||
| Label | Q.5 HOW DID YOU VOTE IN THAT REFERENDUM IN JUNE - IN FAVOUR OR AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 278 | 27.7% | |
| 2.00 | Yes | 311 | 31.0% | |
| 3.00 | No | 413 | 41.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 7 | ||
| Label | Q.6 IN THE NEAR FUTURE DO YOU SEE YOURSELF AS... | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Irish only | 474 | 47.3% |
| 3.00 | Irish and European | 439 | 43.8% | |
| 4.00 | European and Irish | 43 | 4.3% | |
| 5.00 | European only | 13 | 1.3% | |
| 6.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 8 | ||
| Label | Q.7 BY THE DATE OF THE REFERENDUM (2nd OCTOBER), HOW GOOD WAS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | I had a good understanding of what the Treaty was all about | 220 | 22.0% |
| 3.00 | I understood some of the issues but not all that was involved | 380 | 37.9% | |
| 4.00 | I was only vaguely aware of the issues involved | 247 | 24.7% | |
| 5.00 | I did not know what the Treaty was about at all | 152 | 15.2% | |
| 6.00 | Don't Know/Not stated | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 9 | ||
| Label | Q.8 HOW MUCH DO YOU FEEL YOU KNOW ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION, ITS POLICIES, ITS INSTITUTIONS? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (10)10 - Know a great deal | 22 | 2.2% |
| 3.00 | (9) 9 | 23 | 2.3% | |
| 4.00 | (8) 8 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 5.00 | (7) 7 | 117 | 11.7% | |
| 6.00 | (6) 6 | 173 | 17.3% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 182 | 18.2% | |
| 8.00 | (4) 4 | 126 | 12.6% | |
| 9.00 | (3) 3 | 107 | 10.7% | |
| 10.00 | (2) 2 | 66 | 6.6% | |
| 11.00 | (1) 1 - Nothing at all | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 12.00 | Don't know | 6 | 0.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 10 | ||
| Label | Q.9 THE EU CURRENTLY CONSISTS OF FIFTEEN MEMBER STATES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | True | 325 | 32.4% |
| 3.00 | False | 470 | 46.9% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 207 | 20.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 11 | ||
| Label | Q.9 SWITZERLAND IS A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | True | 243 | 24.3% |
| 3.00 | False | 524 | 52.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 235 | 23.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 12 | ||
| Label | Q.9 THE NAME OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS BARROSO | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | True | 533 | 53.2% |
| 3.00 | False | 115 | 11.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 354 | 35.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 13 | ||
| Label | Q.9 THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ARE DIRECTLY ELECTED BY THE CITIZENS OF THE EU | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | True | 607 | 60.6% |
| 3.00 | False | 171 | 17.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 224 | 22.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 14 | ||
| Label | Q.10 IMPROVED PROTECTION OF WORKERS' RIGHTS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 610 | 60.9% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 150 | 15.0% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 242 | 24.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 15 | ||
| Label | Q.10 THE EROSION OF IRISH NEUTRALITY | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 404 | 40.3% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 362 | 36.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 236 | 23.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 16 | ||
| Label | Q.10 ENDING OF IRELAND'S RIGHT TO DECIDE ITS OWN CORPORATE TAX RATE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 339 | 33.8% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 336 | 33.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 327 | 32.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 17 | ||
| Label | Q.10 THE INTRODUCTION OF CONSCRIPTION TO A EUROPEAN ARMY | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 260 | 25.9% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 466 | 46.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 276 | 27.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 18 | ||
| Label | Q.10 INCREASED EFFICIENCY OF EU DECISION-MAKING | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 581 | 58.0% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 141 | 14.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 280 | 27.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 19 | ||
| Label | Q.10 STRENGTHENING EUROPE'S ROLE IN THE WORLD | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 659 | 65.8% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 119 | 11.9% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 224 | 22.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 20 | ||
| Label | Q.10 THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 526 | 52.5% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 122 | 12.2% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 354 | 35.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 21 | ||
| Label | Q.10 LOSS OF IRISH COMMISSIONER FOR 5 OUT OF EVERY 15 YEARS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 339 | 33.8% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 314 | 31.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 349 | 34.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 22 | ||
| Label | Q.10 THE REDUCTION OF IRELAND'S VOTING STRENGTH IN THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 341 | 34.0% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 274 | 27.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 387 | 38.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 23 | ||
| Label | Q.10 THE END OF IRELAND'S CONTROL OVER ITS POLICY ON ABORTION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 292 | 29.1% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 445 | 44.4% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 265 | 26.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 24 | ||
| Label | Q.10 STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN EU DECISION-MAKING | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - included in proposal | 431 | 43.0% |
| 3.00 | No - not included in proposal | 177 | 17.7% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know | 394 | 39.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 25 | ||
| Label | Q.11 DO YOU THINK THAT IRELAND'S MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS... | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | A good thing | 664 | 66.3% |
| 3.00 | A bad thing | 102 | 10.2% | |
| 4.00 | Neither good nor bad | 184 | 18.4% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know | 52 | 5.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 26 | ||
| Label | Q.12 DO YOU THINK THAT, AS A RESULT OF THE YES VOTE IN THE RECENT LISBON TREATY REFERENDUM, IRELAND'S INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION HAS BEEN STRENGTHENED, WEAKENED OR REMAINS UNCHANGED? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very much strengthened | 89 | 8.9% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Somewhat strengthened | 311 | 31.0% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Unchanged | 410 | 40.9% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Somewhat weakened | 82 | 8.2% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Very much weakened | 34 | 3.4% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 76 | 7.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 27 | ||
| Label | Q.13 DO YOU THINK THAT, AS A RESULT OF THE YES VOTE IN THE LISBON TREATY REFERENDUM, IRELAND'S ECONOMIC PROSPECTS HAVE BEEN IMPROVED OR DISIMPROVED OR REMAINS UNCHANGED? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very much improved | 70 | 7.0% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Somewhat improved | 303 | 30.2% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Unchanged | 459 | 45.8% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Somewhat disimproved | 63 | 6.3% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Very much disimproved | 28 | 2.8% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 79 | 7.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 28 | ||
| Label | Q.14a IRELAND SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO FULLY CONTROL IT'S CORPORATE TAXATION RATES / EUROPEAN UNION SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SET A COMMON CORPORATE TAX RATE THROUGHOUT THE UNION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - Ireland should have the power to fully control it's corporate taxation rates | 346 | 34.5% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 193 | 19.3% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 109 | 10.9% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 56 | 5.6% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 34 | 3.4% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 22 | 2.2% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 34 | 3.4% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - European Union should have the power to set a common corporate tax rate throughout the Union | 35 | 3.5% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 98 | 9.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 29 | ||
| Label | Q.14ai HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF CORPORATE TAXATION IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 284 | 28.3% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 390 | 38.9% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 187 | 18.7% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 74 | 7.4% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 21 | 2.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 30 | ||
| Label | Q.14b THE BIG COUNTRIES HAVE FAR TOO MUCH POWER AND INFLUENCE / SMALL COUNTRIES ARE WELL ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR OWN INTERESTS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - The big countries in the European Union have far too much power and influence | 243 | 24.3% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 173 | 17.3% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 104 | 10.4% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 65 | 6.5% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 93 | 9.3% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 69 | 6.9% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 56 | 5.6% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - The small countries in the European Union are well able to defend their own interests | 74 | 7.4% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 52 | 5.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 31 | ||
| Label | Q.14bi HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF SMALL OR BIG COUNTRIES' INFLUENCE ON EUROPEAN DECISION-MAKING IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 287 | 28.6% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 498 | 49.7% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 150 | 15.0% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 54 | 5.4% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 11 | 1.1% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 32 | ||
| Label | Q.14c IRELAND SHOULD DO EVERYTHING IT CAN TO STRENGTHEN ITS NEUTRALITY / IRELAND SHOULD BE WILLING TO ACCEPT LIMITATIONS ON ITS NEUTRALITY | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - Ireland should do everything it can to strengthen its neutrality | 357 | 35.6% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 187 | 18.7% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 118 | 11.8% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 49 | 4.9% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 94 | 9.4% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 48 | 4.8% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 34 | 3.4% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - Ireland should be willing to accept limitations on its neutrality | 26 | 2.6% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 52 | 5.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 33 | ||
| Label | Q.14ci HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF IRISH NEUTRALITY IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 403 | 40.2% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 400 | 39.9% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 142 | 14.2% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 38 | 3.8% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 8 | 0.8% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 11 | 1.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 34 | ||
| Label | Q.14d THERE SHOULD BE MORE EMPHASIS ON THE PROTECTION OF WORKERS' RIGHTS / THERE SHOULD BE LESS EMPHASIS ON THE PROTECTION OF WORKERS' RIGHTS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - There should be more emphasis on the protection of workers' rights | 481 | 48.0% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 193 | 19.3% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 53 | 5.3% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 24 | 2.4% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 21 | 2.1% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 20 | 2.0% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - There should be less emphasis on the protection of workers' rights | 18 | 1.8% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 26 | 2.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 35 | ||
| Label | Q.14di HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF THE PROTECTION OF WORKERS' RIGHTS IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 547 | 54.6% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 357 | 35.6% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 17 | 1.7% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 5 | 0.5% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 36 | ||
| Label | Q.14e THERE SHOULD BE A TOTAL BAN ON ABORTION IN IRELAND / ABORTION SHOULD BE MORE FREELY AVAILABLE IN IRELAND TO ANY WOMAN WHO WANTS TO HAVE ONE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - There should be a total ban on abortion in Ireland | 173 | 17.3% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 47 | 4.7% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 126 | 12.6% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 90 | 9.0% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - Abortion should be more freely available in Ireland to any woman who wants to have one | 145 | 14.5% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 78 | 7.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 37 | ||
| Label | Q.14ei HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF ABORTION IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 272 | 27.1% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 353 | 35.2% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 253 | 25.2% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 83 | 8.3% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 36 | 3.6% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 38 | ||
| Label | Q.14f THE EUROPEAN UNION SHOULD BE LESS INVOLVED IN THE REGULATION OF SMALL COMPANIES AND ENTERPRISES / THE EUROPEAN UNION SHOULD BE MORE INVOLVED IN THE REGULATION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - The European Union should be less involved in the regulation of small companies and enterprises | 193 | 19.3% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 144 | 14.4% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 78 | 7.8% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 115 | 11.5% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 57 | 5.7% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - The European Union should be more involved in the regulation of small companies and enterprises | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 102 | 10.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 39 | ||
| Label | Q.14fi HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF EUROPEAN REGULATION OF SMALL COMPANIES AND ENTERPRISES IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 231 | 23.1% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 412 | 41.1% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 69 | 6.9% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 17 | 1.7% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 7 | 0.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 40 | ||
| Label | Q.14g IRELAND SHOULD SUPPORT THE FURTHER INTEGRATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN DEFENCE AND FOREIGN POLICY / IRELAND SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE FURTHER INTEGRATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - Ireland should support the further integration of the European Union in defence and foreign policy | 89 | 8.9% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 77 | 7.7% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 93 | 9.3% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 93 | 9.3% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 136 | 13.6% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 68 | 6.8% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 79 | 7.9% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - Ireland should not participate in the further integration of the European Union in defence and foreign policy | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 166 | 16.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 41 | ||
| Label | Q.14gi HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF IRISH FOREIGN AFFAIRS IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 185 | 18.5% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 417 | 41.6% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 290 | 28.9% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 65 | 6.5% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 23 | 2.3% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 22 | 2.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 42 | ||
| Label | Q.14h EUROPEAN UNIFICATION HAS ALREADY GONE TOO FAR / EUROPEAN UNIFICATION SHOULD BE PUSHED FURTHER | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - European unification has already gone too far | 163 | 16.3% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 111 | 11.1% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 79 | 7.9% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 145 | 14.5% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 124 | 12.4% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 55 | 5.5% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - European unification should be pushed further | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 122 | 12.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 43 | ||
| Label | Q.14hi HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF EUROPEAN UNIFICATION IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 184 | 18.4% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 450 | 44.9% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 289 | 28.8% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 47 | 4.7% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 19 | 1.9% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 13 | 1.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 44 | ||
| Label | Q.14i PEOPLE COMING TO LIVE HERE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAS MADE IRELAND A MUCH WORSE PLACE TO LIVE / PEOPLE COMING TO LIVE HERE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAS MADE IRELAND A MUCH BETTER PLACE TO LIVE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (9) 1 - People coming to live here from other countries has made Ireland a much worse place to live | 167 | 16.7% |
| 3.00 | (8) 2 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 4.00 | (7) 3 | 97 | 9.7% | |
| 5.00 | (6) 4 | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 6.00 | (5) 5 | 128 | 12.8% | |
| 7.00 | (4) 6 | 128 | 12.8% | |
| 8.00 | (3) 7 | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 9.00 | (2) 8 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 10.00 | (1) 9 - People coming to live here from other countries has made Ireland a much better place to live | 74 | 7.4% | |
| 11.00 | No opinion/Don't know | 34 | 3.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 45 | ||
| Label | Q.14ii HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY THIS ISSUE OF EUROPEAN UNIFICATION IS TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 294 | 29.3% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 451 | 45.0% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 182 | 18.2% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 62 | 6.2% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 11 | 1.1% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 46 | ||
| Label | Q.15 HOW IMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY IS THE ISSUE OF EFFICIENT DECISION-MAKING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION TO YOU PERSONALLY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 239 | 23.9% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 202 | 20.2% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 57 | 5.7% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 18 | 1.8% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 47 | ||
| Label | Q.16 HOW IMPORTANT TO YOU PERSONALLY IS IT THAT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE AN IRISH MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (+2) Very important | 464 | 46.3% |
| 3.00 | (+1) Important | 392 | 39.1% | |
| 4.00 | (0) Neither/nor | 101 | 10.1% | |
| 5.00 | (-1) Not very important | 31 | 3.1% | |
| 6.00 | (-2) Not at all important | 12 | 1.2% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 48 | ||
| Label | Q.17 THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION RECENTLY ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION. SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT TOO MANY ISSUES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Too many issues are decided on by the European Union | 295 | 29.4% |
| 3.00 | The number of issues decided on by the European Union at present is about right | 220 | 22.0% | |
| 4.00 | More issues should be decided on by the European Union | 81 | 8.1% | |
| 5.00 | I have not really thought about it | 142 | 14.2% | |
| 6.00 | It depends on the issue | 191 | 19.1% | |
| 7.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 73 | 7.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 49 | ||
| Label | Q.18A a) MATERIALS PUBLISHED BY THE REFERENDUM COMMISSION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 691 | 69.0% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 43 | 4.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 50 | ||
| Label | Q.18A b) THE BOOKLET PUT OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 829 | 82.7% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 137 | 13.7% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 36 | 3.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 51 | ||
| Label | Q.18A c) THE POSTCARD SENT OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 560 | 55.9% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 364 | 36.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 78 | 7.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 52 | ||
| Label | Q.18A d) YES CAMPAIGN WEBSITES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 242 | 24.2% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 703 | 70.2% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 57 | 5.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 53 | ||
| Label | Q.18A e) NO CAMPAIGN WEBSITES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 232 | 23.2% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 716 | 71.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 54 | 5.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 54 | ||
| Label | Q.18A f) SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES (SUCH AS FACEBOOK) | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 139 | 13.9% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 801 | 79.9% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 62 | 6.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 55 | ||
| Label | Q.18A g) INTERNET ADVERTISEMENTS PUT OUT BY THE YES CAMPAIGN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 172 | 17.2% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 779 | 77.7% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 51 | 5.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 56 | ||
| Label | Q.18A h) INTERNET ADVERTISEMENTS PUT OUT BY THE NO CAMPAIGN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 158 | 15.8% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 784 | 78.2% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 60 | 6.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 57 | ||
| Label | Q.18A i) EMAILS CANVASSING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 127 | 12.7% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 811 | 80.9% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 64 | 6.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 58 | ||
| Label | Q.18A j) EMAILS CANVASSING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 122 | 12.2% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 818 | 81.6% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 62 | 6.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 59 | ||
| Label | Q.18A k) CANVASSERS CALLING TO MY HOME CAMPAIGNING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 561 | 56.0% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 401 | 40.0% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 40 | 4.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 60 | ||
| Label | Q.18A l) CANVASSERS CALLING TO MY HOME CAMPAIGNING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 515 | 51.4% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 441 | 44.0% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 46 | 4.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 61 | ||
| Label | Q.18A m) LEAFLETS/BROCHURES CIRCULATED BY THE PARTIES AND ORGANISATIONS CAMPAIGNING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 803 | 80.1% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 166 | 16.6% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 62 | ||
| Label | Q.18A n) LEAFLETS/BROCHURES CIRCULATED BY THE PARTIES AND ORGANISATIONS CAMPAIGNING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 771 | 76.9% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 198 | 19.8% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 63 | ||
| Label | Q.18A o) LEAFLETS OR FREE NEWSPAPERS AVAILABLE IN CHURCHES ADVOCATING A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 384 | 38.3% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 556 | 55.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 62 | 6.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 64 | ||
| Label | Q.18A p) DISCUSSION WITH FAMILY, FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 800 | 79.8% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 153 | 15.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 49 | 4.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 65 | ||
| Label | Q.18A q) YES POSTERS ON POLES AND BILLBOARDS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 904 | 90.2% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 71 | 7.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 27 | 2.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 66 | ||
| Label | Q.18A r) NO POSTERS ON POLES AND BILLBOARDS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Did see | 862 | 86.0% |
| 3.00 | Did not see | 105 | 10.5% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 35 | 3.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 67 | ||
| Label | Q.18b a) MATERIALS PUBLISHED BY THE REFERENDUM COMMISSION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 311 | 31.0% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 161 | 16.1% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 334 | 33.3% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 179 | 17.9% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 68 | ||
| Label | Q.18b b) THE BOOKLET PUT OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 173 | 17.3% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 185 | 18.5% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 385 | 38.4% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 226 | 22.6% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 69 | ||
| Label | Q.18b c) THE POSTCARD SENT OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 442 | 44.1% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 108 | 10.8% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 245 | 24.5% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 187 | 18.7% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 20 | 2.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 70 | ||
| Label | Q.18b d) YES CAMPAIGN WEBSITES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 760 | 75.8% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 54 | 5.4% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 111 | 11.1% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 58 | 5.8% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 71 | ||
| Label | Q.18b e) NO CAMPAIGN WEBSITES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 770 | 76.8% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 49 | 4.9% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 109 | 10.9% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 15 | 1.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 72 | ||
| Label | Q.18b f) SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES (SUCH AS FACEBOOK) | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 863 | 86.1% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 31 | 3.1% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 53 | 5.3% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 16 | 1.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 73 | ||
| Label | Q.18b g) INTERNET ADVERTISEMENTS PUT OUT BY THE YES CAMPAIGN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 830 | 82.8% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 33 | 3.3% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 62 | 6.2% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 74 | ||
| Label | Q.18b h) INTERNET ADVERTISEMENTS PUT OUT BY THE NO CAMPAIGN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 844 | 84.2% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 25 | 2.5% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 50 | 5.0% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 65 | 6.5% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 18 | 1.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 75 | ||
| Label | Q.18b i) EMAILS CANVASSING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 875 | 87.3% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 23 | 2.3% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 42 | 4.2% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 45 | 4.5% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 76 | ||
| Label | Q.18b j) EMAILS CANVASSING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 880 | 87.8% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 23 | 2.3% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 14 | 1.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 77 | ||
| Label | Q.18b k) CANVASSERS CALLING TO MY HOME CAMPAIGNING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 441 | 44.0% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 112 | 11.2% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 210 | 21.0% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 217 | 21.7% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 22 | 2.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 78 | ||
| Label | Q.18b l) CANVASSERS CALLING TO MY HOME CAMPAIGNING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 487 | 48.6% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 112 | 11.2% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 178 | 17.8% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 199 | 19.9% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 26 | 2.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 79 | ||
| Label | Q.18b m) LEAFLETS/BROCHURES CIRCULATED BY THE PARTIES AND ORGANISATIONS CAMPAIGNING FOR A YES VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 199 | 19.9% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 133 | 13.3% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 364 | 36.3% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 277 | 27.6% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 29 | 2.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 80 | ||
| Label | Q.18b n) LEAFLETS/BROCHURES CIRCULATED BY THE PARTIES AND ORGANISATIONS CAMPAIGNING FOR A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 231 | 23.1% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 134 | 13.4% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 306 | 30.5% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 303 | 30.2% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 28 | 2.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 81 | ||
| Label | Q.18b o) LEAFLETS OR FREE NEWSPAPERS AVAILABLE IN CHURCHES ADVOCATING A NO VOTE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 618 | 61.7% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 104 | 10.4% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 149 | 14.9% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 28 | 2.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 82 | ||
| Label | Q.18b p) DISCUSSION WITH FAMILY, FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 202 | 20.2% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 341 | 34.0% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 324 | 32.3% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 21 | 2.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 83 | ||
| Label | Q.18b q) YES POSTERS ON POLES AND BILLBOARDS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 98 | 9.8% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 124 | 12.4% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 228 | 22.8% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 506 | 50.5% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 46 | 4.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 84 | ||
| Label | Q.18b r) NO POSTERS ON POLES AND BILLBOARDS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 140 | 14.0% | |
| 2.00 | (3) Very valuable | 118 | 11.8% | |
| 3.00 | (2) Somewhat valuable | 207 | 20.7% | |
| 4.00 | (1) Of little or no value | 497 | 49.6% | |
| 5.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 40 | 4.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 85 | ||
| Label | Q.19 OVERALL ARE YOU GENERALLY SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED WITH THE WAY THE GOVERNMENT IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (4) Very satisfied | 21 | 2.1% |
| 3.00 | (3) Quite satisfied | 122 | 12.2% | |
| 4.00 | (2) Quite dissatisfied | 304 | 30.3% | |
| 5.00 | (1) Very dissatisfied | 522 | 52.1% | |
| 6.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 86 | ||
| Label | Q.20 WHAT ABOUT YOUR OWN ECONOMIC SITUATION THESE DAYS? WOULD YOU SAY IT IS ...? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (4) Very good | 34 | 3.4% |
| 3.00 | (3) Fairly good | 431 | 43.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) Fairly bad | 337 | 33.6% | |
| 5.00 | (1) Very bad | 167 | 16.7% | |
| 6.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 87 | ||
| Label | Q.21 a) THE LATE LATE SHOW | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 145 | 14.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 81 | 8.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 89 | 8.9% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 120 | 12.0% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 130 | 13.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 290 | 28.9% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 4 | 0.4% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 88 | ||
| Label | Q.21 b) RTE NEWS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 34 | 3.4% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 14 | 1.4% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 32 | 3.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 71 | 7.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 72 | 7.2% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 121 | 12.1% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 194 | 19.4% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 461 | 46.0% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 3 | 0.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 89 | ||
| Label | Q.21 c) PRIME TIME | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 165 | 16.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 91 | 9.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 99 | 9.9% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 116 | 11.6% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 125 | 12.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 110 | 11.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 211 | 21.1% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 5 | 0.5% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 90 | ||
| Label | Q.21 d) THE WEEK IN POLITICS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 377 | 37.6% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 155 | 15.5% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 95 | 9.5% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 95 | 9.5% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 82 | 8.2% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 53 | 5.3% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 41 | 4.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 97 | 9.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 7 | 0.7% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 91 | ||
| Label | Q.21 e) NIGHTLY NEWS WITH VINCENT BROWNE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 348 | 34.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 137 | 13.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 82 | 8.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 94 | 9.4% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 85 | 8.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 71 | 7.1% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 61 | 6.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 117 | 11.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 7 | 0.7% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 92 | ||
| Label | Q.21 f) OTHER NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS PROGRAMMES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 168 | 16.8% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 82 | 8.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 151 | 15.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 130 | 13.0% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 128 | 12.8% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 150 | 15.0% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 13 | 1.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 93 | ||
| Label | Q.22 a) MORNING IRELAND | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 422 | 42.1% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 106 | 10.6% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 81 | 8.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 72 | 7.2% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 56 | 5.6% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 47 | 4.7% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 129 | 12.9% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 9 | 0.9% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 94 | ||
| Label | Q.22 b) LIVELINE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 435 | 43.4% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 97 | 9.7% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 93 | 9.3% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 72 | 7.2% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 57 | 5.7% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 45 | 4.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 88 | 8.8% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 12 | 1.2% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 95 | ||
| Label | Q.22 c) MARIAN FINUCANE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 454 | 45.3% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 128 | 12.8% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 81 | 8.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 73 | 7.3% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 49 | 4.9% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 72 | 7.2% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 13 | 1.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 96 | ||
| Label | Q.22 d) NEWS AT ONE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 314 | 31.3% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 77 | 7.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 89 | 8.9% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 99 | 9.9% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 161 | 16.1% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 13 | 1.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 97 | ||
| Label | Q.22 e) TODAY WITH PAT KENNY | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 439 | 43.8% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 129 | 12.9% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 81 | 8.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 97 | 9.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 55 | 5.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 55 | 5.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 73 | 7.3% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 14 | 1.4% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 98 | ||
| Label | Q.22 f) MARY WILSON DRIVETIME | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 516 | 51.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 127 | 12.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 54 | 5.4% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 63 | 6.3% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 67 | 6.7% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 58 | 5.8% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 18 | 1.8% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 99 | ||
| Label | Q.22 g) TODAY FM | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 326 | 32.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 99 | 9.9% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 82 | 8.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 97 | 9.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 108 | 10.8% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 109 | 10.9% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 93 | 9.3% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 13 | 1.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 100 | ||
| Label | Q.22 h) NEWSTALK | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 406 | 40.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 114 | 11.4% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 91 | 9.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 94 | 9.4% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 66 | 6.6% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 74 | 7.4% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 66 | 6.6% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 16 | 1.6% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 101 | ||
| Label | Q.22 i) OTHER NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS PROGRAMMES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 338 | 33.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 102 | 10.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 127 | 12.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 85 | 8.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 69 | 6.9% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 18 | 1.8% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 102 | ||
| Label | Q.22 j) LOCAL RADIO STATION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 200 | 20.0% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 62 | 6.2% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 54 | 5.4% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 71 | 7.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 85 | 8.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 85 | 8.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 130 | 13.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 303 | 30.2% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 12 | 1.2% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 103 | ||
| Label | Q.23 a) THE IRISH TIMES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 514 | 51.3% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 69 | 6.9% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 63 | 6.3% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 49 | 4.9% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 56 | 5.6% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 21 | 2.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 107 | 10.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 23 | 2.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 104 | ||
| Label | Q.23 b) THE IRISH INDEPENDENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 338 | 33.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 86 | 8.6% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 101 | 10.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 68 | 6.8% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 80 | 8.0% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 66 | 6.6% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 152 | 15.2% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 24 | 2.4% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 105 | ||
| Label | Q.23 c) THE IRISH EXAMINER | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 618 | 61.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 71 | 7.1% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 42 | 4.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 48 | 4.8% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 30 | 3.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 67 | 6.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 34 | 3.4% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 106 | ||
| Label | Q.23 d) THE SUNDAY TIMES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 589 | 58.8% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 115 | 11.5% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 41 | 4.1% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 28 | 2.8% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 44 | 4.4% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 28 | 2.8% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 79 | 7.9% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 39 | 3.9% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 107 | ||
| Label | Q.23 e) THE SUNDAY INDEPENDENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 435 | 43.4% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 77 | 7.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 68 | 6.8% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 62 | 6.2% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 60 | 6.0% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 63 | 6.3% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 51 | 5.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 154 | 15.4% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 32 | 3.2% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 108 | ||
| Label | Q.23 f) THE SUNDAY TRIBUNE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 648 | 64.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 111 | 11.1% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 69 | 6.9% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 27 | 2.7% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 27 | 2.7% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 21 | 2.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 32 | 3.2% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 30 | 3.0% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 109 | ||
| Label | Q.23 g) THE SUNDAY BUSINESS POST | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 682 | 68.1% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 101 | 10.1% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 43 | 4.3% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 20 | 2.0% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 15 | 1.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 32 | 3.2% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 110 | ||
| Label | Q.23 h) THE SUNDAY WORLD | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 485 | 48.4% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 53 | 5.3% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 67 | 6.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 127 | 12.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 25 | 2.5% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 111 | ||
| Label | Q.23 i) METRO OR HERALD AM | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 673 | 67.2% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 94 | 9.4% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 41 | 4.1% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 26 | 2.6% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 33 | 3.3% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 28 | 2.8% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 35 | 3.5% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 35 | 3.5% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 112 | ||
| Label | Q.23 j) THE IRISH SUN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 562 | 56.1% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 87 | 8.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 57 | 5.7% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 45 | 4.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 47 | 4.7% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 79 | 7.9% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 27 | 2.7% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 113 | ||
| Label | Q.23 k) THE STAR | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 503 | 50.2% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 90 | 9.0% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 49 | 4.9% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 76 | 7.6% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 58 | 5.8% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 56 | 5.6% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 51 | 5.1% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 97 | 9.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 22 | 2.2% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 114 | ||
| Label | Q.23 l) THE IRISH DAILY MAIL | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 586 | 58.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 106 | 10.6% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 55 | 5.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 21 | 2.1% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 35 | 3.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 46 | 4.6% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 31 | 3.1% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 115 | ||
| Label | Q.23 m) THE FARMERS JOURNAL | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 736 | 73.5% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 102 | 10.2% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 32 | 3.2% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 26 | 2.6% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 15 | 1.5% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 12 | 1.2% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 10 | 1.0% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 37 | 3.7% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 32 | 3.2% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 116 | ||
| Label | Q.23 n) ALIVE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 801 | 79.9% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 88 | 8.8% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 16 | 1.6% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 13 | 1.3% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 10 | 1.0% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 15 | 1.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 15 | 1.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 11 | 1.1% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 33 | 3.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 117 | ||
| Label | Q.23 o) LOCAL NEWSPAPER | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 258 | 25.7% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 52 | 5.2% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 45 | 4.5% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 38 | 3.8% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 75 | 7.5% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 113 | 11.3% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 344 | 34.3% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 18 | 1.8% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 118 | ||
| Label | Q.23 p) OTHER NEWSPAPERS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | (0) 0 Never | 507 | 50.6% |
| 3.00 | (1) 1 | 77 | 7.7% | |
| 4.00 | (2) 2 | 64 | 6.4% | |
| 5.00 | (3) 3 | 64 | 6.4% | |
| 6.00 | (4) 4 | 46 | 4.6% | |
| 7.00 | (5) 5 | 40 | 4.0% | |
| 8.00 | (6) 6 | 45 | 4.5% | |
| 9.00 | (7) 7 Very regularly | 106 | 10.6% | |
| Missing Values | 10.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 53 | 5.3% |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 119 | ||
| Label | Q.24 THINKING ABOUT THE LAST GENERAL ELECTION FOR THE DAIL, IN 2007, AS FAR AS YOU CAN REMEMBER, DID YOU VOTE IN THAT ELECTION? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes - voted | 809 | 80.7% |
| 3.00 | Did not vote | 158 | 15.8% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Can't remember | 35 | 3.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 120 | ||
| Label | Q.25a POLITICAL PARTY FEEL CLOSE TO | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | FF | 217 | 21.7% |
| 3.00 | FG | 138 | 13.8% | |
| 4.00 | Labour | 117 | 11.7% | |
| 5.00 | Green Party | 19 | 1.9% | |
| 6.00 | Sinn Fein | 48 | 4.8% | |
| 7.00 | PDs | 2 | 0.2% | |
| 8.00 | Other | 30 | 3.0% | |
| 9.00 | Not close to any/Not stated | 431 | 43.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 121 | ||
| Label | Q.25b POLITICAL PARTY A LITTLE CLOSER TO | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | FF | 29 | 2.9% |
| 3.00 | FG | 27 | 2.7% | |
| 4.00 | Labour | 25 | 2.5% | |
| 5.00 | Green Party | 10 | 1.0% | |
| 6.00 | Sinn Fein | 11 | 1.1% | |
| 7.00 | PDs | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 8.00 | Other | 3 | 0.3% | |
| 9.00 | Not close to any/Not stated | 897 | 89.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 122 | ||
| Label | Q.26 a) NO MORE COUNTRIES TO JOIN THE EUROPEAN UNION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 108 | 10.8% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 608 | 60.7% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 286 | 28.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 123 | ||
| Label | Q.26 b) IRELAND RETAINS CONTROL OF SENSTITVE ETHICAL ISSUES SUCH AS ABORTION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 648 | 64.7% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 142 | 14.2% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 212 | 21.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 124 | ||
| Label | Q.26 c) IRELAND WILL REMAIN IN CONTROL OF IT'S OWN TAXES | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 548 | 54.7% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 168 | 16.8% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 286 | 28.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 125 | ||
| Label | Q.26 d) DIRECT ELECTION OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 416 | 41.5% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 213 | 21.3% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 373 | 37.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 126 | ||
| Label | Q.26 e) IRELAND TO HAVE MORE SEATS IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 272 | 27.1% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 391 | 39.0% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 339 | 33.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 127 | ||
| Label | Q.26 f) IRELAND AND ALL OTHER MEMBER STATES WILL KEEP A COMMISSIONER | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Yes, in the guarantees | 688 | 68.7% |
| 3.00 | No, not in the guarantees | 101 | 10.1% | |
| 4.00 | Don't know/Not stated | 213 | 21.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 128 | ||
| Label | SEX | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Male | 492 | 49.1% |
| 3.00 | Female | 510 | 50.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 129 | ||
| Label | MARITAL STATUS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Married/living as married | 591 | 59.0% |
| 3.00 | Single | 318 | 31.7% | |
| 4.00 | Widowed/divorced/separated | 93 | 9.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 130 | ||
| Label | AGE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | 18-21 | 63 | 6.3% |
| 3.00 | 22-24 | 70 | 7.0% | |
| 4.00 | 25-34 | 213 | 21.3% | |
| 5.00 | 35-49 | 299 | 29.8% | |
| 6.00 | 50-64 | 225 | 22.5% | |
| 7.00 | 65+ | 132 | 13.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 131 | ||
| Label | SOCIAL CLASS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | AB | 134 | 13.4% |
| 3.00 | C1 | 311 | 31.0% | |
| 4.00 | C2 | 236 | 23.6% | |
| 5.00 | DE | 260 | 25.9% | |
| 6.00 | F50+ | 43 | 4.3% | |
| 7.00 | F50- | 18 | 1.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 132 | ||
| Label | REGION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Dublin | 290 | 28.9% |
| 3.00 | Rest of Leinster | 248 | 24.8% | |
| 4.00 | Munster | 288 | 28.7% | |
| 5.00 | Connacht/ Ulster | 176 | 17.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 133 | ||
| Label | AREA | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Urban | 624 | 62.3% |
| 3.00 | Rural | 378 | 37.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 134 | ||
| Label | WORKING STATUS | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Housewife | 188 | 18.8% |
| 3.00 | Self employed | 102 | 10.2% | |
| 4.00 | Employee | 453 | 45.2% | |
| 5.00 | Unemployed - searching for a job | 66 | 6.6% | |
| 6.00 | Unemployed - notsearching for a job | 30 | 3.0% | |
| 7.00 | Student | 59 | 5.9% | |
| 8.00 | Retired | 104 | 10.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 135 | ||
| Label | INDUSTRY TYPE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 537 | 53.6% | |
| 2.00 | Building/construction | 51 | 5.1% | |
| 3.00 | Computers/IT | 16 | 1.6% | |
| 4.00 | Finance | 35 | 3.5% | |
| 5.00 | Agriculture | 39 | 3.9% | |
| 6.00 | Food production | 16 | 1.6% | |
| 7.00 | Government/Civil Service/Teaching/Healthcare | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 8.00 | Leisure | 13 | 1.3% | |
| 9.00 | Manufacturing | 20 | 2.0% | |
| 10.00 | Media | 6 | 0.6% | |
| 11.00 | Professionals | 14 | 1.4% | |
| 12.00 | Retail/Wholesale/Distribution | 6 | 0.6% | |
| 13.00 | Other services | 121 | 12.1% | |
| 14.00 | Other | 25 | 2.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 136 | ||
| Label | SECTOR WORKS IN | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 447 | 44.6% | |
| 2.00 | Public sector | 151 | 15.1% | |
| 3.00 | Private sector | 404 | 40.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 137 | ||
| Label | FINISHED EDUCATION | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Primary | 75 | 7.5% |
| 3.00 | Secondary | 588 | 58.7% | |
| 4.00 | Third level | 280 | 27.9% | |
| 5.00 | Still at school/college | 59 | 5.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 138 | ||
| Label | ATTENDS MASS/ CHURCH SERVICE | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | Daily | 28 | 2.8% |
| 3.00 | Weekly | 341 | 34.0% | |
| 4.00 | Several times a month | 113 | 11.3% | |
| 5.00 | Only occasionally | 380 | 37.9% | |
| 6.00 | Never | 140 | 14.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 139 | ||
| Label | NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLD | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | 2.00 | 1 | 107 | 10.7% |
| 3.00 | 2 | 274 | 27.3% | |
| 4.00 | 3 | 222 | 22.2% | |
| 5.00 | 4 | 238 | 23.8% | |
| 6.00 | 5 | 106 | 10.6% | |
| 7.00 | 6 | 37 | 3.7% | |
| 8.00 | 7 | 14 | 1.4% | |
| 9.00 | 8 | 3 | 0.3% | |
| 10.00 | 9+ | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 140 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDINAL REASONS (NET) | 118 | 11.8% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDINAL REASONS (NET) | 367 | 36.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 141 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDINAL REASONS (ONLY) | 150 | 15.0% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDINAL REASONS (ONLY) | 335 | 33.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 142 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Felt it was the right thing to do/Good gut feeling about it/Had nothing to lose | 443 | 44.2% | |
| 1.00 | Felt it was the right thing to do/Good gut feeling about it/Had nothing to lose | 42 | 4.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 143 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Treaty good for Ireland (unspecified)/Best for us/Is the way forward/Country needs an injection of energy | 388 | 38.7% | |
| 1.00 | Treaty good for Ireland (unspecified)/Best for us/Is the way forward/Country needs an injection of energy | 97 | 9.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 144 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Treaty good for Europe (unspecified)/Ireland stronger with EU | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Treaty good for Europe (unspecified)/Ireland stronger with EU | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 145 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no EU has been/is good for Ireland (unspecified)/Jobs/Economic state of Ireland/to save international trading | 405 | 40.4% | |
| 1.00 | EU has been/is good for Ireland (unspecified)/Jobs/Economic state of Ireland/to save international trading | 80 | 8.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 146 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no EU has been/is good for Irish economy | 391 | 39.0% | |
| 1.00 | EU has been/is good for Irish economy | 94 | 9.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 147 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Irish infrastructure has benefited from EU/Europe is productive | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | Irish infrastructure has benefited from EU/Europe is productive | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 148 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Treaty makes EU more efficient/allows EU to develop/progress/Strengthens Europe in the world | 479 | 47.8% | |
| 1.00 | Treaty makes EU more efficient/allows EU to develop/progress/Strengthens Europe in the world | 6 | 0.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 149 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Ireland needs to belong fully to EU/Cannot manage without EU/Would have no future/Is the only option | 421 | 42.0% | |
| 1.00 | Ireland needs to belong fully to EU/Cannot manage without EU/Would have no future/Is the only option | 64 | 6.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 150 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Maintain Irish influence in Europe/Stronger hold in Europe | 470 | 46.9% | |
| 1.00 | Maintain Irish influence in Europe/Stronger hold in Europe | 15 | 1.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 151 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Respondent feels European/is a supporter of European integration/Democracy | 462 | 46.1% | |
| 1.00 | Respondent feels European/is a supporter of European integration/Democracy | 23 | 2.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 152 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no GROUP REASONS (NET) | 477 | 47.6% | |
| 1.00 | GROUP REASONS (NET) | 8 | 0.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 153 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no GROUP REASONS (ONLY) | 478 | 47.7% | |
| 1.00 | GROUP REASONS (ONLY) | 7 | 0.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 154 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Good for groups - farmers | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Good for groups - farmers | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 155 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Good for groups - workers | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Good for groups - workers | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 156 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Good for groups - business | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Good for groups - business | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 157 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Good for groups - women | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Good for groups - women | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 158 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 457 | 45.6% | |
| 1.00 | FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 28 | 2.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 159 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no FOLLOWED ADVICE (ONLY) | 469 | 46.8% | |
| 1.00 | FOLLOWED ADVICE (ONLY) | 16 | 1.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 160 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Government | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Government | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 161 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - party | 471 | 47.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - party | 14 | 1.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 162 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - trades union | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - trades union | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 163 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA) | 483 | 48.2% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA) | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 164 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - employer organization | 483 | 48.2% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - employer organization | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 165 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - family/friends | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - family/friends | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 166 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 167 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no CAMPAIGN ARGUMENTS/PROTAGONISTS (NET) | 467 | 46.6% | |
| 1.00 | CAMPAIGN ARGUMENTS/PROTAGONISTS (NET) | 18 | 1.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 168 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no CAMPAIGN ARGUMENTS/PROTAGONISTS (ONLY) | 471 | 47.0% | |
| 1.00 | CAMPAIGN ARGUMENTS/PROTAGONISTS (ONLY) | 14 | 1.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 169 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Persuaded by YES arguments/Agreed with overall principle | 475 | 47.4% | |
| 1.00 | Persuaded by YES arguments/Agreed with overall principle | 10 | 1.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 170 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Rejected/put off by NO arguments | 477 | 47.6% | |
| 1.00 | Rejected/put off by NO arguments | 8 | 0.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 171 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Put off by NO groups | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Put off by NO groups | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 172 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Put off by named NO parties | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Put off by named NO parties | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 173 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no OTHER REASONS (NET) | 386 | 38.5% | |
| 1.00 | OTHER REASONS (NET) | 99 | 9.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 174 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no OTHER REASONS (ONLY) | 411 | 41.0% | |
| 1.00 | OTHER REASONS (ONLY) | 74 | 7.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 175 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Didn't understand it but gave it the benefit of the doubt | 483 | 48.2% | |
| 1.00 | Didn't understand it but gave it the benefit of the doubt | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 176 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Don't know | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Don't know | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 177 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Wanted change | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Wanted change | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 178 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Other reason for YES vote | 463 | 46.2% | |
| 1.00 | Other reason for YES vote | 22 | 2.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 179 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Best for our kids/For younger people | 481 | 48.0% | |
| 1.00 | Best for our kids/For younger people | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 180 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no We are too small to be isolated/to be left on our own/Better to be in than out/Don't want Ireland to be in a lower le | 441 | 44.0% | |
| 1.00 | We are too small to be isolated/to be left on our own/Better to be in than out/Don't want Ireland to be in a lower leagu | 44 | 4.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 181 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no More opportunities/prospects | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | More opportunities/prospects | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 182 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Everyone else was voting YES | 471 | 47.0% | |
| 1.00 | Everyone else was voting YES | 14 | 1.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 183 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Understood some of the issues/More clear information | 477 | 47.6% | |
| 1.00 | Understood some of the issues/More clear information | 8 | 0.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 184 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Amendments and changes/Changes in abortion | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | Amendments and changes/Changes in abortion | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 185 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no We could keep our rights | 483 | 48.2% | |
| 1.00 | We could keep our rights | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 186 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Not stated | 481 | 48.0% | |
| 1.00 | Not stated | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 187 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING (NET) | 223 | 22.3% | |
| 1.00 | INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING (NET) | 48 | 4.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 188 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING (ONLY) | 233 | 23.3% | |
| 1.00 | INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING (ONLY) | 38 | 3.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 189 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Lack of information, knowledge, understanding, treaty too complex | 228 | 22.8% | |
| 1.00 | Lack of information, knowledge, understanding, treaty too complex | 43 | 4.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 190 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Not sure of opinion so voted NO/Not sure of outcome so voted NO | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Not sure of opinion so voted NO/Not sure of outcome so voted NO | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 191 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no LOSS OF POWER/INDEPENDENCE/IDENTITY (NET) | 232 | 23.2% | |
| 1.00 | LOSS OF POWER/INDEPENDENCE/IDENTITY (NET) | 39 | 3.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 192 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no LOSS OF POWER/INDEPENDENCE/IDENTITY (ONLY) | 245 | 24.5% | |
| 1.00 | LOSS OF POWER/INDEPENDENCE/IDENTITY (ONLY) | 26 | 2.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 193 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of power, domination by large countries, dictated to by other countries/EU getting more power over Ireland/Bruss | 247 | 24.7% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of power, domination by large countries, dictated to by other countries/EU getting more power over Ireland/Brussels | 24 | 2.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 194 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of/threat to Ireland's independence/crush us | 264 | 26.3% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of/threat to Ireland's independence/crush us | 7 | 0.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 195 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of/threat to Irish identity/kill us | 262 | 26.1% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of/threat to Irish identity/kill us | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 196 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO ASPECTS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION (NET) | 252 | 25.1% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO ASPECTS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION (NET) | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 197 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO ASPECTS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION (ONLY) | 258 | 25.7% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO ASPECTS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION (ONLY) | 13 | 1.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 198 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Against European integration in general/We are being taken over by European issues/Against beliefs/Better on our own | 261 | 26.0% | |
| 1.00 | Against European integration in general/We are being taken over by European issues/Against beliefs/Better on our own | 10 | 1.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 199 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no For European integration but Lisbon is a step too far/prefer status quo | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | For European integration but Lisbon is a step too far/prefer status quo | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 200 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Too much EU regulation/bureaucracy/Not everything should be decided in Europe | 263 | 26.2% | |
| 1.00 | Too much EU regulation/bureaucracy/Not everything should be decided in Europe | 8 | 0.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 201 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Too much immigration | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Too much immigration | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 202 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO ISSUES IN/ATTRIBUTED TO THE LISBON TREATY (NET) | 213 | 21.3% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO ISSUES IN/ATTRIBUTED TO THE LISBON TREATY (NET) | 58 | 5.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 203 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO ISSUES IN/ATTRIBUTED TO THE LISBON TREATY (ONLY) | 225 | 22.5% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO ISSUES IN/ATTRIBUTED TO THE LISBON TREATY (ONLY) | 46 | 4.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 204 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Lisbon Treaty a bad deal, bad for Ireland/Not a good idea/Not of much good | 248 | 24.8% | |
| 1.00 | Lisbon Treaty a bad deal, bad for Ireland/Not a good idea/Not of much good | 23 | 2.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 205 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of Irish Commissioner on rotating basis (note: Commissioner sometimes written as Commission) | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of Irish Commissioner on rotating basis (note: Commissioner sometimes written as Commission) | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 206 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of control over taxation (unspecified) | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of control over taxation (unspecified) | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 207 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of control over corporate taxation | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of control over corporate taxation | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 208 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Keep Ireland's veto (unspecified) | 265 | 26.4% | |
| 1.00 | Keep Ireland's veto (unspecified) | 6 | 0.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 209 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Loss of/diminution of Irish neutrality (unspecified) | 264 | 26.3% | |
| 1.00 | Loss of/diminution of Irish neutrality (unspecified) | 7 | 0.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 210 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would lead to militarization of Europe | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Would lead to militarization of Europe | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 211 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would expose Irish people to conscription into a European army | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | Would expose Irish people to conscription into a European army | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 212 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would lead to wider availability of abortion in Ireland | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Would lead to wider availability of abortion in Ireland | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 213 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would lead to introduction of gay marriage in Ireland | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Would lead to introduction of gay marriage in Ireland | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 214 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would lead to introduction of euthanasia in Ireland | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Would lead to introduction of euthanasia in Ireland | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 215 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Would threaten/reduce workers' rights, introduce low wages and a 'race to the bottom'/Swedish decision on wages in Eu | 258 | 25.7% | |
| 1.00 | Would threaten/reduce workers' rights, introduce low wages and a 'race to the bottom'/Swedish decision on wages in Europ | 13 | 1.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 216 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Bad for farmers | 269 | 26.8% | |
| 1.00 | Bad for farmers | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 217 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Bad for workers | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Bad for workers | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 218 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Bad for fishermen/Kicked out of the fishing industry | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Bad for fishermen/Kicked out of the fishing industry | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 219 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO REFERENDUM PROCESS (NET) | 226 | 22.6% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO REFERENDUM PROCESS (NET) | 45 | 4.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 220 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no ATTITUDES TO REFERENDUM PROCESS (ONLY) | 232 | 23.2% | |
| 1.00 | ATTITUDES TO REFERENDUM PROCESS (ONLY) | 39 | 3.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 221 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Used as opportunity to vote against/punish the government | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Used as opportunity to vote against/punish the government | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 222 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Voted no because dislike/distrust politics/politicians | 267 | 26.6% | |
| 1.00 | Voted no because dislike/distrust politics/politicians | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 223 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no I did not have confidence in the government/Government was secretive and cagey - failed to provide information and ar | 252 | 25.1% | |
| 1.00 | I did not have confidence in the government/Government was secretive and cagey - failed to provide information and argum | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 224 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Didn't like being told how to vote without arguments being given/Didn't like being bullied or pushed into voting yes | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Didn't like being told how to vote without arguments being given/Didn't like being bullied or pushed into voting yes | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 225 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Government campaign was arrogant/Didn't like the Government's attitude/Government are all a load of gangsters | 269 | 26.8% | |
| 1.00 | Government campaign was arrogant/Didn't like the Government's attitude/Government are all a load of gangsters | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 226 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no NO campaign had better and clearer arguments/Mr. Ganley talks | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | NO campaign had better and clearer arguments/Mr. Ganley talks | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 227 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Not convinced by YES arguments/Did not believe the info supplied | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Not convinced by YES arguments/Did not believe the info supplied | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 228 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Media coverage leading to NO vote | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Media coverage leading to NO vote | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 229 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Peer group discussion leading to NO vote | 269 | 26.8% | |
| 1.00 | Peer group discussion leading to NO vote | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 230 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Voted NO in order to resist all the pressure to vote YES | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Voted NO in order to resist all the pressure to vote YES | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 231 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Not enough discussion and debate | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Not enough discussion and debate | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 232 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Other reason for voting NO | 202 | 20.2% | |
| 1.00 | Other reason for voting NO | 69 | 6.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 233 | ||
| Label | Q.2A WHAT WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY YOU VOTED AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY IN THE REFERENDUM LAST MONTH? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Not stated | 247 | 24.7% | |
| 1.00 | Not stated | 24 | 2.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 234 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 278 | 27.7% | |
| 1.00 | FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 207 | 20.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 235 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Government/Brian Cowen/Changes by government | 426 | 42.5% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Government/Brian Cowen/Changes by government | 59 | 5.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 236 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - party | 420 | 41.9% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - party | 65 | 6.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 237 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - trades union | 481 | 48.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - trades union | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 238 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA)/Farmer’s journal | 476 | 47.5% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA)/Farmer’s journal | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 239 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - employer organization/IBEC/Business interests | 474 | 47.3% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - employer organization/IBEC/Business interests | 11 | 1.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 240 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - family/friends/other people | 421 | 42.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - family/friends/other people | 64 | 6.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 241 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 456 | 45.5% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 29 | 2.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 242 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no The Church/Priests | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | The Church/Priests | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 243 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Media | 455 | 45.4% | |
| 1.00 | Media | 30 | 3.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 244 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no TV/News programs/Current affairs programs/RTE | 389 | 38.8% | |
| 1.00 | TV/News programs/Current affairs programs/RTE | 96 | 9.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 245 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Radio | 446 | 44.5% | |
| 1.00 | Radio | 39 | 3.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 246 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Press/Paper/Booklet/Posters/Articles/Literature | 388 | 38.7% | |
| 1.00 | Press/Paper/Booklet/Posters/Articles/Literature | 97 | 9.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 247 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Personal/Made up my mind/Good for Ireland/Nobody influenced me | 430 | 42.9% | |
| 1.00 | Personal/Made up my mind/Good for Ireland/Nobody influenced me | 55 | 5.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 248 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Internet | 481 | 48.0% | |
| 1.00 | Internet | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 249 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Freedom | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Freedom | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 250 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no The right thing to do | 482 | 48.1% | |
| 1.00 | The right thing to do | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 251 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Bad for Ireland | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Bad for Ireland | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 252 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Didn’t understand the treaty | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | Didn’t understand the treaty | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 253 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no All sources | 472 | 47.1% | |
| 1.00 | All sources | 13 | 1.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 254 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Don’t know | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Don’t know | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 255 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Political debates/talks | 468 | 46.7% | |
| 1.00 | Political debates/talks | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 256 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Polls | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Polls | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 257 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Our economic situation | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Our economic situation | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 258 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Businessmen | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Businessmen | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 259 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Student volunteer groups | 481 | 48.0% | |
| 1.00 | Student volunteer groups | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 260 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Referendum Commission | 480 | 47.9% | |
| 1.00 | Referendum Commission | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 261 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Libertas/Declan Ganley | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Libertas/Declan Ganley | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 262 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Workmates/Colleagues | 476 | 47.5% | |
| 1.00 | Workmates/Colleagues | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 263 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Michael O’Leary/Declan Ganly debate | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | Michael O’Leary/Declan Ganly debate | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 264 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no The Coir Campaign | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | The Coir Campaign | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 265 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no The ‘NO’ Campaigners | 485 | 48.4% | |
| 1.00 | The ‘NO’ Campaigners | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 266 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no The EU | 484 | 48.3% | |
| 1.00 | The EU | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 267 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no None | 459 | 45.8% | |
| 1.00 | None | 26 | 2.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 268 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 517 | 51.6% | |
| .00 | no Not stated | 462 | 46.1% | |
| 1.00 | Not stated | 23 | 2.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 269 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 195 | 19.5% | |
| 1.00 | FOLLOWED ADVICE (NET) | 76 | 7.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 270 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Government/Brian Cowen/Changes by government | 262 | 26.1% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Government/Brian Cowen/Changes by government | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 271 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - party | 252 | 25.1% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - party | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 272 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - trades union | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - trades union | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 273 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA)/Farmer’s journal | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - Irish Farmers Association (IFA)/Farmer’s journal | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 274 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - employer organization/IBEC/Business interests | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - employer organization/IBEC/Business interests | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 275 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - family/friends/other people | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - family/friends/other people | 31 | 3.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 276 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 254 | 25.3% | |
| 1.00 | Followed advice - local TD/Politicians | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 277 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no The Church/Priests | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | The Church/Priests | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 278 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Media | 262 | 26.1% | |
| 1.00 | Media | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 279 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no TV/News programs/Current affairs programs/RTE | 233 | 23.3% | |
| 1.00 | TV/News programs/Current affairs programs/RTE | 38 | 3.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 280 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Radio | 258 | 25.7% | |
| 1.00 | Radio | 13 | 1.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 281 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Press/Paper/Booklet/Posters/Articles/Literature | 226 | 22.6% | |
| 1.00 | Press/Paper/Booklet/Posters/Articles/Literature | 45 | 4.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 282 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Personal/Made up my mind/Good for Ireland/Nobody influenced me | 224 | 22.4% | |
| 1.00 | Personal/Made up my mind/Good for Ireland/Nobody influenced me | 47 | 4.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 283 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Internet | 267 | 26.6% | |
| 1.00 | Internet | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 284 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Freedom | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Freedom | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 285 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no The right thing to do | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | The right thing to do | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 286 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Bad for Ireland | 266 | 26.5% | |
| 1.00 | Bad for Ireland | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 287 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Didn’t understand the treaty | 260 | 25.9% | |
| 1.00 | Didn’t understand the treaty | 11 | 1.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 288 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no All sources | 269 | 26.8% | |
| 1.00 | All sources | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 289 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Don’t know | 263 | 26.2% | |
| 1.00 | Don’t know | 8 | 0.8% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 290 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Political debates/talks | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | Political debates/talks | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 291 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Polls | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Polls | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 292 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Our economic situation | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Our economic situation | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 293 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Businessmen | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | Businessmen | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 294 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Student volunteer groups | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Student volunteer groups | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 295 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Referendum Commission | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | Referendum Commission | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 296 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Libertas/Declan Ganley | 265 | 26.4% | |
| 1.00 | Libertas/Declan Ganley | 6 | 0.6% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 297 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Workmates/Colleagues | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | Workmates/Colleagues | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 298 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Michael O’Leary/Declan Ganly debate | 269 | 26.8% | |
| 1.00 | Michael O’Leary/Declan Ganly debate | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 299 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no The Coir Campaign | 268 | 26.7% | |
| 1.00 | The Coir Campaign | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 300 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no The ‘NO’ Campaigners | 270 | 26.9% | |
| 1.00 | The ‘NO’ Campaigners | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 301 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no The EU | 271 | 27.0% | |
| 1.00 | The EU | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 302 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no None | 247 | 24.7% | |
| 1.00 | None | 24 | 2.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 303 | ||
| Label | Q.2B WHICH PEOPLE/ORGANISATIONS/NEWS SOURCES WHERE THE MAIN INFLUENCE ON YOUR DECISION TO VOTE AGAINST THE LISBON TREATY? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 731 | 73.0% | |
| .00 | no Not stated | 252 | 25.1% | |
| 1.00 | Not stated | 19 | 1.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 304 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no VOLUNTARY ABSTENTION (NET) | 100 | 10.0% | |
| 1.00 | VOLUNTARY ABSTENTION (NET) | 141 | 14.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 305 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Lack of understanding, lack of information, too complicated/Didn't make sense | 171 | 17.1% | |
| 1.00 | Lack of understanding, lack of information, too complicated/Didn't make sense | 70 | 7.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 306 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Undecided/uncertain which way to vote, confused/could not make up mind | 217 | 21.7% | |
| 1.00 | Undecided/uncertain which way to vote, confused/could not make up mind | 24 | 2.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 307 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Campaigns unsatisfactory | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Campaigns unsatisfactory | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 308 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Opposed to/did not like the Lisbon treaty | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Opposed to/did not like the Lisbon treaty | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 309 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Not interested in politics | 232 | 23.2% | |
| 1.00 | Not interested in politics | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 310 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Not interested in Europe/European integration | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Not interested in Europe/European integration | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 311 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Couldn't be bothered/not interested/Will make no difference to me/Hadn't the fire | 207 | 20.7% | |
| 1.00 | Couldn't be bothered/not interested/Will make no difference to me/Hadn't the fire | 34 | 3.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 312 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Dislikes/distrusts politicians/politics | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Dislikes/distrusts politicians/politics | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 313 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Never votes | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Never votes | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 314 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Don't know | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Don't know | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 315 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Already voted once, that's enough | 221 | 22.1% | |
| 1.00 | Already voted once, that's enough | 20 | 2.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 316 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Felt we were not being told the truth | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Felt we were not being told the truth | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 317 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no CIRCUMSTANTIAL ABSTENTION (NET) | 154 | 15.4% | |
| 1.00 | CIRCUMSTANTIAL ABSTENTION (NET) | 87 | 8.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 318 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Away from home (unspecified) | 224 | 22.4% | |
| 1.00 | Away from home (unspecified) | 17 | 1.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 319 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Away from home (work/studies) | 234 | 23.4% | |
| 1.00 | Away from home (work/studies) | 7 | 0.7% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 320 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Away from home (holiday) | 226 | 22.6% | |
| 1.00 | Away from home (holiday) | 15 | 1.5% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 321 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Registered at another location/I haven't changed my address | 231 | 23.1% | |
| 1.00 | Registered at another location/I haven't changed my address | 10 | 1.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 322 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Other registration/voting card problem/Name not on register | 231 | 23.1% | |
| 1.00 | Other registration/voting card problem/Name not on register | 10 | 1.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 323 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Too busy/no time - work constraints | 237 | 23.7% | |
| 1.00 | Too busy/no time - work constraints | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 324 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Too busy/no time - family commitments | 238 | 23.8% | |
| 1.00 | Too busy/no time - family commitments | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 325 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Too busy/no time - reason unspecified | 232 | 23.2% | |
| 1.00 | Too busy/no time - reason unspecified | 9 | 0.9% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 326 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Illness | 231 | 23.1% | |
| 1.00 | Illness | 10 | 1.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 327 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Disability | 241 | 24.1% | |
| 1.00 | Disability | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 328 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Transport issues | 239 | 23.9% | |
| 1.00 | Transport issues | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 329 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Other reason (unspecified) | 241 | 24.1% | |
| 1.00 | Other reason (unspecified) | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 330 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no I forgot | 238 | 23.8% | |
| 1.00 | I forgot | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 331 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Felt we were being allowed to vote to satisfy the government | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Felt we were being allowed to vote to satisfy the government | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 332 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Fed up of being told what to do/Sick of it all | 238 | 23.8% | |
| 1.00 | Fed up of being told what to do/Sick of it all | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 333 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Angry with the government | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Angry with the government | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 334 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no No reason | 237 | 23.7% | |
| 1.00 | No reason | 4 | 0.4% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 335 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Would be no good for the country | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Would be no good for the country | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 336 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Election was held on a weekday | 240 | 24.0% | |
| 1.00 | Election was held on a weekday | 1 | 0.1% | |
| Value | Count | Percent | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 337 | ||
| Label | Q.3 WHY DID YOU NOT VOTE? | |||
| Type | Numeric | |||
| Format | F8.2 | |||
| Measurement | Nominal | |||
| Role | Input | |||
| Valid Values | -99.99 | 761 | 75.9% | |
| .00 | no Not stated | 236 | 23.6% | |
| 1.00 | Not stated | 5 | 0.5% | |
| Value | ||
| Standard Attributes | Position | 338 |
| Label | EXACT AGE OF RESPONDENT | |
| Type | Numeric | |
| Format | F8.2 | |
| Measurement | Scale | |
| Role | Input | |
| N | Valid | 1002 |
| Missing | 0 | |
| Central Tendency and Dispersion | Mean | 43.5908 |
| Standard Deviation | 15.95405 | |
| Percentile 25 | 30.0000 | |
| Percentile 50 | 42.0000 | |
| Percentile 75 | 56.0000 | |
ABOUT
| Created Using: IBM SPSS Statistics 25 |
| Creation Date: Oct 09, 2020 |
| Document Version: Original |
| Saved Date: Oct 09, 2020 |
Navigation Controls
| Contents - Opens and closes the list of charts and tables in the Web Report |
| Next & Previous - Display the next or previous table or chart in the Web Report |
| Help - Opens Help |
Toolbar Buttons
| Undo - Undoes the last change in the document. | |
| Edit - Open the Editor tool for tables and charts. Certain editing options are only available when you are connected to an Internet server. | |
| Save - Creates a new copy of the Web Report with the saved changes. | |
| Print - Prints the current object when in Object View and all objects in Page View. | |
| Page View - Switches the Web Report to display all the tables and charts on a single page. | |
| Object View - Switches the Web Report so that each table or chart is displayed one at a time. |
Connecting to a Server
Editing Tables
| Some of this functionality is only available when connected to an Internet server. | |
| Create a chart - Create a chart from the selected cells in the table. | |
| Pivot and Sort - Transpose, sort, and pivot the table. | |
| Background color - The background color of the selected cells. | |
| Text Color and Style - Font color, style, and size. | |
| Number Format - Font color, style, and size. | |
Editing Charts
| All of this functionality is only available when connected to an Internet server. | |
| Chart Size - Change the height and width of the chart | |
| Background color - The background color of the selected object. | |
| Border and Line Style - The color and thickness of the line or border. | |
| Text Color and Style - Font color, style, and size. | |
| Number Format - Font color, style, and size. | |
| Axis Properties - Change the scale and display axis titles and ticks. | |
| Lock aspect ratio | ||
| 0.00 |
| Display Axis Title | |||
| Display Ticks | |||