logo Hurry, Grab up to 30% discount on the entire course
Order Now logo

Ask This Question To Be Solved By Our ExpertsGet A+ Grade Solution Guaranteed

expert
Daniels FarmerSociology
(5/5)

577 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Bharat BhushanData mining
(5/5)

895 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Jim TavareLaw
(5/5)

584 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Neill BissonnetteData mining
(5/5)

980 Answers

Hire Me
Others
(5/5)

Compare and contrast the 10 types of microscopes discussed from bright-field to stereo microscope

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS

Microbial Cell Structure and Taxonomy

General Instructions:

You may use any size of bond paper. Recycled bond papers will do. Use additional sheets of paper, if necessary. Write on one side of the paper. Please write legibly using a black permanent pen. Pencils are not allowed.

 Please refer to Activity Guidelines (see separate document) for the filename and submission guidelines.

Critical Thinking Questions

In this activity, you will be graded based on your ability to analyze and evaluate connections to Lesson 2 concepts. 

1.    Compare and contrast the 10 types of microscopes discussed (from bright-field to stereo microscope) in terms of the following parameters:

·   source of illumination

·   quality of images produced

·  applications in the field of Microbiology (provide only 1 specific example)

 Create a table. Limit your answers to 1-2 sentences only. You may present your answers in bulleted style. This is equivalent to 30 points.

 2.    Evaluate the statement: "Members of the domain Archaea are more like Eukaryotes."

 In 10 sentences, come up with an evaluation essay by analyzing thoroughly the statement presented. What features make them more like Eukaryotes? How about characteristics that make members of Archaea more like bacteria?

 Take note that you are asked to create an evaluation essay and not a review. A review is based entirely on your own opinion. Ensure that all your claims should remain unbiased by supporting evidence. Use a defined set of criteria or parameters to judge the statement. It may be necessary to cite references. Avoid plagiarism or copy-pasting of work. This is equivalent to 30 points.

Evaluation Essay Grading Rubric 

Category

8 — 10 pts

5 — 7 pts

2 — 4 pts

0 — 1 pt

Total

 

Argument and Evidence

 

 

·  Clarity of purpose

·  Critical and original thought

Clearly articulates a

Articulates a

Articulates a

Does not articulate a

 

position/argument.

position/argument

position/argument

position/argument.

 

 

but incomplete or

that is unfocused or

 

 

Presents evidence

limited in scope.

ambiguous.

Presents a lot of

 

that is relevant and

 

 

inaccurate and/or

 

accurate. Presents

sufficient amount of

Presents evidence

that is mostly

Presents evidence

that is somewhat

irrelevant evidence.

Does not present any

10

evidence to support

relevant and/or

inaccurate and/or

evidence at all.

 

argument.

mostly accurate.

irrelevant. Does not

 

 

 

Presents limited

present enough

 

 

 

evidence to support

evidence to support

 

 

 

argument.

argument.

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Understanding

 

·Use of examples

·Content indicates synthesis of idea

Shows a deep and

Shows a limited

Shows a superficial

Shows no

 

robust

understanding of the

understanding of

understanding of the

 

understanding of the

topic, not quite a

the topic. Argument

topic and no

 

topic with a fully

fully developed

is not well

argument is

 

developed

argument.

developed.

presented. Does not

 

argument. Fully

Adequately

Discusses minor

discuss the

 

discusses the major

implications and/or

discusses some of

the major

implications and/or

applications

implications and/or

applications of the

10

applications of the

implications and/or

(missing the major

argument.

 

argument.

applications of the

ones) OR does not

 

 

 

argument.

discuss major

 

 

 

 

implications and/or

 

 

 

 

applications

 

 

 

 

adequately.

 

 

 

Paper is logically

Paper has a clear

There is some level

There is no apparent

 

 

organized. Easily

organizational

of organization

organization to the

 

Structure and

followed. Effective,

structure with some

though digressions,

paper. Difficult to

 

Organization

 

·      Flow of thought

·      Transitions

·      Format

smooth, and logical

transitions. Professional format.

digressions,

ambiguities or irrelevances. Easily followed. Basic transitions.

Structured format

ambiguities,

irrelevances are too many. Difficult to follow. Ineffective transitions.

Rambling format

follow. No or poor

transitions. No format

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

(5/5)
Attachments:

Related Questions

. The fundamental operations of create, read, update, and delete (CRUD) in either Python or Java

CS 340 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  Overview: For this assignment, you will implement the fundamental operations of create, read, update,

. Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This  program will have two classes, a LineItem class and a Transaction class

Retail Transaction Programming Project  Project Requirements:  Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This

. The following program contains five errors. Identify the errors and fix them

7COM1028   Secure Systems Programming   Referral Coursework: Secure

. Accepts the following from a user: Item Name Item Quantity Item Price Allows the user to create a file to store the sales receipt contents

Create a GUI program that:Accepts the following from a user:Item NameItem QuantityItem PriceAllows the user to create a file to store the sales receip

. The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and implementing an industry-standard interface. Regardless of whether you choose to pursue application development goals as a pure developer or as a software engineer

CS 340 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric  Overview The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and impleme