logo Hurry, Grab up to 30% discount on the entire course
Order Now logo

Ask This Question To Be Solved By Our ExpertsGet A+ Grade Solution Guaranteed

expert
Edwin BenningLaw
(5/5)

903 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Nikhil JainComputer science
(5/5)

999 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Charu SinghalStatistics
(/5)

589 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Connor EvanssEconomics
(5/5)

860 Answers

Hire Me
SPSS
(5/5)

To test this hypothesis, the authors recruited individuals who were currently involved in romantic relationships, and asked

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS

The data (ReactionEvent.sav) sought to examine whether individuals would be able to predict their reactions to rediscovering ordinary vs. extraordinary events. The authors predicted that people may underestimate the levels of curiosity and interest they will experience when looking back on the ordinary day-to-day experiences of their lives, whereas they will be accurate when predicting their future reactions to extraordinary events.

To test this hypothesis, the authors recruited individuals who were currently involved in romantic relationships, and asked half of the participants to write about an extraordinary day with their romantic partner (Valentine’s Day), and the other half to write about an ordinary day with their romantic partner (what happened two days ago). The authors then asked participants rate the degree of extraordinariness for their diary entry, to check to see if this manipulation was effective.

The authors also asked participants to predict how they would view their written description in the future. In particular, participants predicted their levels of curiosity and interest (a composite of how enjoyable, interesting, meaningful, and surprising the thought they would find the description), should they rediscover the description in the future.

Three months later, the authors contacted all of the participants, and had them read their description of the extraordinary or ordinary day, and then rate how extraordinary the event was in retrospect, as well as their levels of curiosity and interest upon rediscovering the description (once again, the interest rating was a composite of enjoyable, interesting, meaningful, and surprising ratings). They also rated how detailed their memory was for the event in the diary entry, and the percentage of what they wrote about that they remembered.

General Note: Your answer to each part of question should be supported by proper statistical analysis.

Note 1: You might not need all variables in the data file to answer following questions, you should decide which variable is relevant which one not.

Note 2: T1 designates that the variable was measured at first session, whereas T2 designates that the variable was measured at second session.

1. Please identify all potential IVs and DVs. Be sure to include type of variable (levels of measurement) and describe for each IV whether the study is a within or between group design.

2. Apply any appropriate descriptive statistics to help you learn about the subjects in each group of this study, describes the key characteristics of the subjects (gender and age).

3. You first want to show that participants in the Extraordinary condition actually perceived that event to be more extraordinary than did participants in the Ordinary condition. Conduct an analysis to compare the perceived extraordinariness of the events at the first session. 

4. The major hypothesis of the study was that people may underestimate the levels of extraordinariness they will experience when looking back on the ordinary day-to-day experiences of their lives, whereas they will be accurate when predicting their future reactions to extraordinary events. What kind of statistical hypothesis testing is appropriate to test researcher’s hypothesis? To support researcher’s hypothesis what kind of effect should be significant (main effect, interaction etc.)? Please run your analysis and report on results? Do the result support researcher’s hypothesis?

Note: a t-test on second session data is not an appropriate answer. You should use both session’s one and two data for both extraordinary and ordinary groups.

5. Repeat the analysis in question 4 on level of curiosity and also level of interest. Do you reach to the same conclusion as Q4?

6. The researchers also believed that level of extraordinariness at the second session might be different between men and women. Use the second session data for both ordinary and extraordinary group to test researchers’ hypothesis?

(5/5)
Attachments:

Related Questions

. The fundamental operations of create, read, update, and delete (CRUD) in either Python or Java

CS 340 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  Overview: For this assignment, you will implement the fundamental operations of create, read, update,

. Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This  program will have two classes, a LineItem class and a Transaction class

Retail Transaction Programming Project  Project Requirements:  Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This

. The following program contains five errors. Identify the errors and fix them

7COM1028   Secure Systems Programming   Referral Coursework: Secure

. Accepts the following from a user: Item Name Item Quantity Item Price Allows the user to create a file to store the sales receipt contents

Create a GUI program that:Accepts the following from a user:Item NameItem QuantityItem PriceAllows the user to create a file to store the sales receip

. The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and implementing an industry-standard interface. Regardless of whether you choose to pursue application development goals as a pure developer or as a software engineer

CS 340 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric  Overview The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and impleme