logo Hurry, Grab up to 30% discount on the entire course
Order Now logo
359 Times Downloaded

Ask This Question To Be Solved By Our ExpertsGet A+ Grade Solution Guaranteed

expert
Victor JordanEnglish
(5/5)

642 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Luke HillPsychology
(5/5)

606 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Richardd RussellHistory
(4/5)

766 Answers

Hire Me
expert
Hemidov MuradManagement
(5/5)

743 Answers

Hire Me
Econometrics
(5/5)

U.S. public firms, which we augment with a new data set on marital status of CEOs t

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS

This article may be used only for the purposes of research, teaching, and/or private study. Commercial use or systematic downloading (by robots or other automatic processes) is prohibited without explicit Publisher approval, unless otherwise noted. For more information, contact permissions@informs.org.

The Publisher does not warrant or guarantee the article’s accuracy, completeness, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. Descriptions of, or references to, products or publications, or inclusion of an advertisement in this article, neither constitutes nor implies a guarantee, endorsement, or support of claims made of that product, publication, or service.

Do managers’ personal traits matter? A burgeoning recent literature provides ample evidence that indi- vidual chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics impact corporate policies. One of the key dimensions of heterogeneity across individuals is differential attitudes toward risk. Such heterogeneity can have important real consequences insofar as it drives corporate invest- ment and research and development (R&D) activities. In this paper, we explore whether risk attitudes across CEOs reflect only innate differences in preferences or whether factors external to the firm also play a role. More specifically, we investigate the impact of CEO marital status on corporate risk taking.

We explore this question using a standard sample of

U.S. public firms, which we augment with a new data set on marital status of CEOs that we compile from a variety of public sources. We find that companies run by CEOs classified as single in our data set exhibit higher levels of stock return volatility and pursue more aggressive investment policies than otherwise comparable firms, consistent with the hypothesis of greater risk taking by single managers. These effects are both economically and statistically quite meaningful. A firm headed by a single CEO, controlling for a variety of personal and firm characteristics, exhibits stock return volatility that is 3% higher and invests 10% more on average.

The difference in volatilities is driven by varying exposures to idiosyncratic rather than systematic risk. The investment policies vary with marital status for capital expenditures, as well as R&D spending and 

acquisitions, which are commonly associated with risk taking. There is also some evidence that firm leverage is higher for firms with single CEOs. The effect of marital status is weaker for older managers, indicating that selection into marriage based on an unobserved personal characteristic that is correlated with risk taking is an unlikely driver of our results. This is because such a selection effect would suggest the opposite pattern: if the propensity to get married varies across people, those for whom this propensity is low will likely be overrepresented among single individuals at older ages.

Importantly, we control for firm characteristics in our analysis, so that our findings do not simply reflect the tendency of single CEOs to be matched with riskier firms. If we omit firm controls, the relationship between marital status and risk taking becomes significantly stronger (coefficients typically increase by a factor of five), suggesting that single CEOs indeed are more likely to run relatively risky firms.1 Furthermore, we demonstrate that single CEOs impact firm investment decisions by exploiting within-firm variation in idiosyn- cratic return volatility over time. We show that whereas married CEOs reduce investment in response to an increase in idiosyncratic risk (consistent with Panousi and Papanikolaou 2012), those CEOs who are single

 

(5/5)
Attachments:

Expert's Answer

359 Times Downloaded

Related Questions

. The fundamental operations of create, read, update, and delete (CRUD) in either Python or Java

CS 340 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  Overview: For this assignment, you will implement the fundamental operations of create, read, update,

. Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This  program will have two classes, a LineItem class and a Transaction class

Retail Transaction Programming Project  Project Requirements:  Develop a program to emulate a purchase transaction at a retail store. This

. The following program contains five errors. Identify the errors and fix them

7COM1028   Secure Systems Programming   Referral Coursework: Secure

. Accepts the following from a user: Item Name Item Quantity Item Price Allows the user to create a file to store the sales receipt contents

Create a GUI program that:Accepts the following from a user:Item NameItem QuantityItem PriceAllows the user to create a file to store the sales receip

. The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and implementing an industry-standard interface. Regardless of whether you choose to pursue application development goals as a pure developer or as a software engineer

CS 340 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric  Overview The final project will encompass developing a web service using a software stack and impleme